Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamjarcars
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jamjarcars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources, failing to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the article primarily relies on self-published sources or promotional content, it would violate Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom, There is nothing notable about this brand, fails WP:SIGCOV, Non notable brand Best Regards (CP) 08:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Websites, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Agreed. I can see some passing mentions in trade journals, but no significant coverage. Tacyarg (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment searching for jamjar.com may be (slightly) more fruitful. The company was (one of ?) the first online car sales platforms in the (UK|world). 25 years on and most of that online history is lost. The mass of television advertising that was pervasive around the turn of the millennium has vanished. The notability of the first iteration of the business was not maintained by any of the later iterations. Cabayi (talk) 11:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Even on YT I could only find youtu . be / UtjJzeO3KVs - Cabayi (talk) 11:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Merge with NatWest Group: they've owned part of the business, could be a brief section under the main business' article. Oaktree b (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - lack of SIGCOV, kind of on the fence with SIGCOV, since a lot of the coverage from the new millennium has disappeared. There is a possible COI and PROMO issue however. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.